The Art of Moksha
Trapping in a fuss because of differences, make the fact that we are denying an item that clearly exists and is present. The act of denying is also an act of refusing the universe to be present to support our intentions as synchronicity.
Some of the adults were social engineering products in 80's era in Java that was installed using the kid's song (I prefer to call it mantras), “Duaan duaan ulah siririkan anu eleh dikaluarkeun sakali jadi” and “hom pimpa alaihum gambreng” … Sunda and Javanese song to started kids game also spell to unite differences that are packaged in the articulation of the game.
“Sakali jadi” and “gambreng” are other words for “Kun fa ya kun (Arabic word)”… Let it Come as Being Spontaneusly. ;)
And other mantras that are not categorized as prayers. Prayer is seen from a form such as an individual “knot”… While a mantra is more in the form of a collective “knot”. Maybe one day someone will experiment with making the mantra (“duaan duaan…” or “hom pimpa…”) as a prayer. when it comes to the intention of making children. We will be able to see the difference and its impact on the child’s myelin structure :D
===
The conversation above is a free and casual conversation starter overnight about “events”… “Ikhlas (sincere)”… and “moksha” in a more functionally mapped framework (f). A way to generate trust.. or in three-dimensional form is mapped in force (F).
Trust itself is a realm that is often equated with belief. It’s different though. Belief is composed of system and function artifacts. Meanwhile, trust can be separated from those two things. The resemblance occurs because both rely on “knots”… Another language of hizb and/or spells, or the cool language is now a social algorithm.
On the other hand, there is a mindset gap that often equates to the roles of hizb and prayer. Prayer requires individual intentions, while Hizb requires collective and sometimes hierarchical intentions.
Prayer does not require supervision / sanad. Can directly function in the process of internalization. Hizb requires a supervision gate (teacher’s blessing) that is talaqqi (derived using a contextual method, based on 5 sense experience).
When something is communal and hierarchical, then something will have an end, have an end, which is in the form of a randomization process.
Several system artifacts suggest this randomization process can be avoided by consciously parsing. Unleash function and hierarchy.
Releasing this function and hierarchy can be in a physical form (changing/disguising/unifying oneself with other natural elements) or releasing roles.
Many system artifacts show this pattern, such as the “moksa” of Prabu Siliwangi, the unraveling of the hierarchy of Selaparang royal figures, etc.
This decomposition cannot occur if you have not mastered the highest science: sincerity. take it all off. Letting go, untying the knot that binds the crown, and trusting 100% of the macro and microsystems are simultaneous cyclical work.
With the highest knowledge, namely sincerity, work is no longer in dimension (f), and can no longer be destroyed, because, like the principle of energy, everything moves. If anyone stops in a knot of time, it’s just to wait, to be strengthened or split. Then apply simultaneously.
So it is a necessity if the moments that occur in the function-based dimensions will be mapped and readable. If we step back and go up a bit, in helicopter view, then we can see a connection. A map of the system.
Fear -if we eliminate the time variable- occurs because the future, present, and past are not in sync. Asynchronous is a characteristic of something that does not exist, meaning it leaves a trail of emptiness. In fact, an event is an existence, something that should be traced can be measured, and have an impact. Is and is not, is a way of measuring, marker/benchmark, how a function-based dimension works. This is where we can see how a process often identified with “moksha” can occur.
And dislike can be fortune (adding value) or even sin (reducing value). If it is used to pacify the system, it is a sin if it results in destroying the system’s order.
For system practitioners, enjoying exposure is not the main thing, seeing gestures and even micro gestures is already a language. Often exposure is required for verification purposes or is purely administrative in nature.
If a system includes elements of “art” in it, then spontaneity and honesty will enter the system variables. It becomes measurable/mapped, but the pattern is only seen when it is simulated in 4 dimensions, linking oneself (with knowledge and intentions) as a container for the object being measured. If only in 3-dimensional glasses, only seeing from the outside, then a system map no longer functions communally, roughly speaking, no longer produces mestakung/synchronicity ;), no longer becomes a “mantra”, or communal node, which can be a generating point, catalyst and awareness booster and photographic memory in certain situations, and only becomes a spectacle that is difficult to decipher. In addition, the intention to change the character of spontaneity and honesty will be detected. This intention can be mapped from the past (motif, genetics, the Javanese language is 3B → bebet (gene), bibit (seed), bobot (value)), and the future (large constellation, new shape).
So we really need the capacity in embodying wisdom and conscience in playing the dimensions of function-based spontaneity without awareness at the highest level (to enlight, just like what Dr. David Hawkins has said), sincerity, and trust.